Blogs

7 years 2 months ago

NEW YORK -- The CEO of Uber says New York City should impose a fee on app-hailed rides to help taxi medallion owners who are struggling with debt.

CEO Dara Khosrowshahi told the New York Post on Monday the city should put the surcharge into a fund to help taxi owners who bought their medallions at sky-high prices. He didn't say how much the fee should be.

"In circumstances where medallion owner-operators are having a hard time, where technology has changed and demand patterns has changed their environment, we would support some kind of fee or pool to be formed, a hardship fund, call it," Khosrowshahi said.

Because taxi drivers in New York City are required to own them, medallions were once extremely valuable and highly coveted because the demand for cabs was stable. But in the years since Uber and similar companies disrupted the industry, a medallion's value has fallen from as much as $1 million to $200,000.
Drivers working for Uber and other app-based companies don't need medallions, and now many taxi owners who thought their medallions would continue to grow in value say they're hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt.

Advocates have blamed five apparent suicides of drivers since last November on the taxi industry's woes.

In the most recent case, yellow cab owner-driver Yu Mein Chow was found floating in the East River last month. The city medical examiner hasn't determined a cause of death, but Chow's family members believe he jumped to his death.

A livery cab driver shot himself to death outside City Hall in February after writing a Facebook post blaming politicians for the taxi industry's decline.

Groups that represent drivers blasted Khosrowshahi's proposal.

"Dara Khosrowshahi's proposals are a slap in the face to struggling drivers and an attempt to get out of being regulated," said Bhairavi Desai, executive director of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance.
The Independent Drivers Guild, which represents Uber drivers, said Khosrowshahi "needs to address the widespread hardship faced by drivers for his own company before considering taking another cut from our sub-minimum-wage pay."
© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.


5 years 7 months ago

The amount you are required to pay back to your general unsecured creditors in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Case depends on various factors.  It can range from only a few pennies on the dollar to a 100% of the debt. The amount required to be paid must be the higher of the "Means Test" (projected disposable income) and the amount of the chapter 7 liquidation test.Means TestThe amount you are required to pay back must be at least the amount of you "projected disposable income" as calculated by the "means test" used in Chapter 13.  Basically, your monthly income is calculated and your expenses are deducted, leaving the "projected disposable income."
For purpose of this test, your income is based on the income for the six months period prior to the filing of the bankruptcy case. If the income changes, higher or lower, the new figure may be required to be used. The expenses used in these test are not your actual living expenses, but they are amounts based on the IRS collection standards for certain items and actual mortgage and car loan debts.The amount of  expenses is deducted from the income leaving the monthly "projected disposable income." Debtor with income less than median income will only be required to pay for three years, but over-median income debtors are required to pay for five years.Chapter 7 Liquidation TestThe amount required to be paid back in a Chapter 13 case must be at least as much as the "chapter 7 liquidation test" which is the amount that could be received on a hypothetical chapter 7 liquidation of your property.Jordan E. Bublick - Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer - North Miami & Kendall Offices - (305) 891-4055 - www.bublicklaw.com


5 years 7 months ago

The amount you are required to pay back to your general unsecured creditors in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Case depends on various factors.  It can range from only a few pennies on the dollar to a 100% of the debt. The amount required to be paid must be the higher of the "Means Test" (projected disposable income) and the amount of the chapter 7 liquidation test.Means TestThe amount you are required to pay back must be at least the amount of you "projected disposable income" as calculated by the "means test" used in Chapter 13.  Basically, your monthly income is calculated and your expenses are deducted, leaving the "projected disposable income."
For purpose of this test, your income is based on the income for the six months period prior to the filing of the bankruptcy case. If the income changes, higher or lower, the new figure may be required to be used. The expenses used in these test are not your actual living expenses, but they are amounts based on the IRS collection standards for certain items and actual mortgage and car loan debts.The amount of  expenses is deducted from the income leaving the monthly "projected disposable income." Debtor with income less than median income will only be required to pay for three years, but over-median income debtors are required to pay for five years.Chapter 7 Liquidation TestThe amount required to be paid back in a Chapter 13 case must be at least as much as the "chapter 7 liquidation test" which is the amount that could be received on a hypothetical chapter 7 liquidation of your property.Jordan E. Bublick - Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer - North Miami & Kendall Offices - (305) 891-4055 - www.bublicklaw.com


7 years 2 months ago

By Zack Friedman

It's one of the most intensely-debated student loan questions: Can you discharge your student loans in bankruptcy?
The short answer: normally, student loans are not dischargeable. However, that may change.

Here's what you need to know - and why.

Student Loans & Bankruptcy: Overview

First, a quick overview. As many borrowers struggle to repay ballooning student loan debt, bankruptcy is one option that gets floated.

According to Make Lemonade, there are more than 44 million borrowers who collectively owe $1.5 trillion in student loan debt in the U.S. The average student in the Class of 2016 has $37,172 in student loan debt.

Student loans are now the second highest consumer debt category - behind mortgages, but ahead of credit card debt.

Unlike other consumer debt such as credit card and mortgage debt, however, student loans traditionally cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.

Why? Some can't explain the rationale for the student loan "no bankruptcy" exception, but others say it grew from a concern that student loan borrowers could take advantage of bankruptcy laws, borrow a bunch of debt, earn a degree and then file for bankruptcy.

There are exceptions, however, namely if certain conditions regarding financial hardship are met.

The Brunner Test: Financial Hardship
Those conditions are reflected in the Brunner test, which is the legal test in all circuit courts, except the 8th circuit and 1st circuit. The 8th circuit uses a totality of circumstances, which is similar to Brunner, while the 1st circuit has yet to declare a standard.

In plain English, the Brunner standard says:

  1. the borrower has extenuating circumstances creating a hardship;
  2. those circumstances are likely to continue for a term of the loan; and
  3. the borrower has made good faith attempts to repay the loan. (The borrower does not actually have to make payments, but merely attempt to make payments - such as try to find a workable payment plan.)

There are variances across federal districts, but that’s the basic framework.

How Do You Discharge Student Loans In Bankruptcy?

In order to have a student loan discharged through bankruptcy, an Adversary Proceeding (a lawsuit within bankruptcy court) must be filed, where a debtor claims that paying the student loan would create an undue hardship for the debtor.

Were Student Loans Ever Dischargeable In Bankruptcy?

Yes. Prior to 1976, you could discharge your student loans in bankruptcy.

Congress then changed the law: student loans were dischargeable if they had been in repayment for five years. Subsequently, that period was extended to seven years.

In 1998, Congress removed dischargeablility except if a debtor could show that paying back the student loans would create an undue hardship. In 2005, Congress extended this protection to private student loans.

So, What's Changed Now?

According to the Wall Street Journal, which spoke to more than 50 current and past bankruptcy judges appointed during both Democratic and Republican administrations, some judges may be more open to helping debtors.

Does that mean the floodgates are now open and student loans can be discharged in bankruptcy?

No.

That said, some judges are looking at ways to help alleviate the burden. Examples, per the Wall Street Journal, may include:

  • encouraging bankruptcy attorneys to represent debtors at no cost
  • potentially eliminating future tax bills that be linked to student loan debt relief or debt cancellation after 25 years through federal student loan repayment programs
  • cancelling private student loan debt from unaccredited schools
  • allowing student loan borrowers to make full payments during the Chapter 13 debt repayment period (which can last five years)

While these tactics may be welcomed by some student loan borrowers, critics may question whether judges should actively try to circumvent the existing law (suggesting that Congress, and not judges, should make the law).

Since the vast majority of student loan debt outstanding is comprised of federal student loans, any cancellation of federal student loan debt would be at the federal government's (and taxpayer) expense.

What Else Can You Do If Your Struggling To Make Student Loan Payments?

Here are two strategies:

1. Income-Driven Repayment: For federal student loans, consider an income-driven repayment plan such as IBR, PAYE or REPAYE. Your payment is based on your income, family size and other factors, and is typically lower than the standard repayment plan.

After a certain period of time (such as 20 or 25 years, for example), your federal student loans (not private student loans) can be forgiven. However, you likely will owe income taxes on the amount of your student loans that are forgiven.

2. Pay Off Other Consumer Debt: If you have other high interest debt such as credit card debt, consider paying off this debt first (particularly if the interest rate is higher than your student loan interest rate). This can free up cash that can be applied to student loan debt reduction.

You can also consider a personal loan to pay off your credit card debt. Credit card consolidation is the process of paying off your existing credit card debt with a single personal loan at a lower interest rate.

If you can borrow a personal loan at a lower interest rate than your credit card debt, you can save in interest costs and also potentially improve your credit score.

© 2018 Forbes Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.


7 years 2 months ago

The May 2018 New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC) sales results have been released to the public. And as is our practice, provided below are James Shenwick’s comments about those sales results.

1. The volume of transfers rose from April. In May, there were 37 taxi medallion sales (excluding stock transfers).
2. 21 of the 37 sales were foreclosure sales, which means that the medallion owner defaulted on the bank loan and the banks were foreclosing to obtain possession of the medallion. We disregard these transfers in our analysis of the data, because we believe that they are outliers and not indicative of the true value of the medallion, which is a sale between a buyer and a seller under no pressure to sell (fair market value).  Four additional transfers were family or estate transactions for minimal or no consideration, which we have also excluded from our analysis.
3. The amount of foreclosure sales indicates, in our opinion, that medallion values will continue to decline.
4. The twelve regular sales ranged from a low of $150,000 (one medallion), to two medallions at $155,000, to two medallions at $160,000, to two medallions at $175,000, to two medallions at $190,000, to one medallion at $200,000 and two medallions at $287,500.
5. The sales volume rose from April’s eight regular sales. At this stage of the market, not many parties are involved in selling or buying medallions, possibly due to the fear that medallion prices may further decrease.
6. The median of May’s sales was $175,000, a $2,500 (1.4 %) decrease from April’s median sales of $177,500.
7. Based on this data and market conditions, we do not believe that taxi medallion values have bottomed out.
Please continue to read our blog to see what happens to medallion pricing in the future. Any individuals or businesses with questions about taxi medallion valuations or workouts should contact Jim Shenwick at (212) 541-6224 or via email at j[email protected].


7 years 2 months ago

In interviews with the Wall Street Journal, more than 50 current and former bankruptcy judges, frustrated at seeing borrowers leave federal courtrooms with six-figure debts, say they or their colleagues are more open to chipping away at the decades-old guidelines that determine how such debt is treated.
 
“If the law’s not going to be improved by Congress, we have to help these young people who are drowning in student loan debt,” said U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge John Waites in South Carolina.
Outright cancellations remain rare, but judges said they have other tools at their disposal, including encouraging lawyers to represent borrowers for nothing. The lawsuits can cost $3,000 to $10,000 and take years.
 
Other judges are embracing debt-relief techniques that don’t fully erase student loans but make repayment more affordable by, for instance, canceling future related tax bills. The popularity of these relief strategies could get a boost from a panel of professors, judges and advocates who are studying failures in consumer bankruptcy law and plan to release a report next year.

Nearly 45 million people carry student debt in the U.S.—the total amount has more than doubled over the past decade to $1.4 trillion—most backed by the federal government. It has eclipsed credit cards as the largest source of consumer debt after mortgages. Almost every other type can be extinguished in bankruptcy, but legal standards made college debt largely untouchable. Borrowers typically must repay student loans over their lifetime, even those facing extreme financial hardship.In March, Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell said he would be “at a loss to explain” why student loans can’t be cancelled like other debt. The Trump administration is considering whether to fight cancellation requests less aggressively.

Consumer bankruptcy lawyers are starting to notice that judges are being more flexible. One Las Vegas law firm recently filed the first cancellation request in its 14-year history after hearing a judge at a conference voice concern over student loans. Other lawyers said growing sympathy among judges is making lenders more willing to reach resolutions out of court.

“I’m getting really good results with settlements these days,” said Chicago lawyer David Leibowitz. “I’m not the only one.”

Rules governing how student debt is handled in bankruptcy are made by Congress and by judges who issue influential rulings. Several bills in Congress that would erase student-loan debt in bankruptcy have stalled in recent years.

Last year in Philadelphia, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Eric Frank cancelled a single mother’s $30,000 in student loans. Opposing lawyers from the U.S. Department of Education said the borrower needed to prove her hardship would persist 25 years, the length of some repayment plans. Judge Frank ruled that the relevant window was five years.

An appeals court overturned his ruling, but his decision inspired Judge Mary Jo Heston in Tacoma, Wash., in December to cancel a portion of another borrower’s loans.

Such rulings are rare because few troubled borrowers attempt to cancel their student loans, because of the historically slim chances of victory. Last year, only 473 people of the millions repaying student loans sought relief using bankruptcy, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.

No one tracks outcomes of student-loan cancellation cases, and only a handful advance to the point where a judge rules. In one examination of cases in 2017, judges ruled on student-loan debt 16 times, according to lawyer Austin Smith who analyzed WestLaw’s database of key decisions.

In those decisions, judges preserved student-loan debt in 12 cases, and canceled it in three. One borrower got partial relief.

Some bankruptcy judges criticize their colleagues for re-interpreting well-settled law on student loans. “My view is, if the law is clear, follow it,” said retired California judge Peter Bowie.

The push to rethink the legal standard on student-loan debt is bipartisan. Judges interviewed by the Wall Street Journal were appointed during both Republican and Democratic administrations, though bankruptcy judges are appointed by appeals court judges, not the president.

Disagreements among judges on student-loan debt expose philosophical differences, said Cornell Law School professor Jeffrey Rachlinski. Some judges want to maintain predictability by sticking to past law. Others see their roles as fixing flaws in the legal system, he said. “There are people who like to change the institution in which they work.”

Before 1976, laws allowed borrowers to do away with student-loan debt in bankruptcy. Congress, out of concern that new graduates would take too much advantage of that option, made a new rule: Borrowers could cancel student loan debt after only five years of payments. Judges could grant exceptions if borrowers showed that repaying would cause “undue hardship.”

Congress didn’t define “undue hardship” so the task of doing so fell to federal judges. When Marie Brunner, a 1982 graduate of a master’s program in social work, tried to cancel her loans in bankruptcy, a New York judge in 1985 said she had to show three things: she struggled financially, her struggles would continue and that she had made a good faith effort to repay. She lost.

That list still serves as a baseline for hardship in circuit courts that control the rules in most states.

Some appeals courts set even higher benchmarks, with one, for instance, saying borrowers must face a “certainty of hopelessness.”

In 1998 Congress said any borrower trying to cancel any federal student loans must prove “undue hardship,” like Ms. Brunner. Congress gave private student loans the same protection in 2005.

Some of the country’s bankruptcy judges are starting to argue that the prevailing legal standard is unintentionally harsh and wasn’t meant for adults still on the hook for student-loan debt years after college.

Judge Frank Bailey in Boston made that argument in an April ruling wiping out $50,000 in student loans for a 39-year-old man whose health ailments prevent him from working.

Frustrated judges are more likely to “look for wiggle room and try to find solutions that will allow them to sleep at night, ”said Terry Maroney, a Vanderbilt Law School professor who studies judicial decision-making.

Some judges, including U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Michael Kaplan in Trenton, N.J., said they are looking for ways to be more forgiving after seeing their own adult children borrow heavily for their education. Other judges grew concerned after talking to their law clerks. The typical law-school student takes out $119,000 in loans, according to the legal-education watchdog group Law School Transparency.

Two judges said they regret their rulings against borrowers more than a decade ago. One Florida judge said that if the case was filed today, the borrower would win.

Kansas judge Dale Somers said he worked particularly hard to justify the reasoning in a December 2016 ruling that cancelled more than $230,000 in interest that built up on a couple’s student loans from the 1980s. They left bankruptcy owing the original amount: $78,000.

Alabama judge William Sawyer declared that student loans had become “a life sentence” in a 2015 decision cancelling a $112,000 student loan debt for high school science teacher Alexandra Conniff, a single mother of two teen boys whose yearly income is $59,400.

She took out loans for several degrees, including a Ph.D. in special education, a discipline she also taught. Repaying them over 15 years would cost $843 a month.

Ms. Conniff testified she has been unable to land higher-paying jobs and keeps costs down. Federally contracted lawyers argued she could cut retirement savings, life insurance payments and $100 in monthly landline-phone costs. The case is under appeal and was sent back to Judge Sawyer to re-rule.

Copyright ©2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


7 years 2 months ago

By Will Bredderman
Who speaks for Uber drivers?
As market saturation and driver suicides wrack the taxi and black-car industry, and the city gears up for another street fight with ride-hail apps, three powerhouse unions are in an equally heated drag race to represent car operators working under Uber, Lyft and their competitors. All call themselves the definitive voice of tens of thousands of drivers and claim the others are frauds.
One twist in this union fight is that Uber and Lyft drivers are independent contractors, not employees, and thus cannot bargain collectively. That has become one of the biggest disputes among the combatants: the Independent Drivers Guild (an offshoot of the International Association of Machinists), the New York Taxi Workers Alliance (aligned with and partly staffed by building workers union 32BJ SEIU) and the Amalgamated Transit Union.
As proof of its legitimacy, the Taxi Workers Alliance, a volunteer organization founded in 1998 to organize drivers of yellow cabs, cites its lawsuits to get app-dispatch drivers recognized as employees of the tech giants. One of those suits won unemployment benefits for some Uber drivers; another, accusing the company of misclassifying its entire workforce, found the company skimming its hacks' fares.Battling Uber, 'opportunists'The alliance contrasts itself from the IDG, which came into existence in 2016 after the Machinists reached an accord with Uber. In exchange for the company's recognizing the Guild as the representative of Uber drivers and helping fund the organization's internal operations, the Machinists agreed not to push for employee status.
"It's not defending workers' rights when you decide that workers who don't have the ability to set the price of their labor are contractors," said Eugenio Villasantes, a spokesman for Taxi Workers Alliance benefactor 32BJ.
"We not only had to fight the company that had become the highest valuated company on earth," said the alliance's executive director, Bharivai Desai, "we also had to fight opportunists in the labor movement that were trying to be the first to make a deal with Uber."
The IDG denied Desai's accusation that it is a "company union." Noting that Desai's husband is a taxi medallion owner, the Guild insinuates that her group's push for regulations on apps—notably Mayor Bill de Blasio's failed 2015 plan to cap their growth—are really attempts to drive the new tech companies out of the market.
IDG steward Sohail Rana defended his organization's acceptance of Uber funding, saying it has paid for legal assistance, classes and organizing space for drivers. He said IDG petitions had compelled Uber and Lyft to introduce in-app tipping, and the IDG is now lobbying the Taxi and Limousine Commission to mandate minimum pay for drivers.
"These other organizations, they were not there," said Rana. "IDG is the only union that really helps drivers in real time."
The ATU, which has long represented bus drivers, argues that it is the most natural fit for the industry and claims it has gotten 16,000 drivers to sign union cards since 2016. The ATU's competition dismissed this as a stunt because the drivers are classified as contractors and cannot join the union. 
But the ATU deemed it "an experiment" that could lead to something dramatic.
"All organizing is to prepare for a strike," Chris Townsend, director of field mobilization for ATU Local 1181, told Crain's. Townsend demurred on whether such an action was imminent and said his union focuses on getting legal assistance for aggrieved drivers.
De Blasio and the City Council recently reopened discussion of passing legislation to contain the sector's astronomical growth, though a consensus has yet to emerge on how. The Taxi Workers Alliance has revived its calls to limit the number of new vehicles the Taxi and Limousine Commission can approve; the IDG has demanded a cap on the number of new drivers. Uber and Lyft, meanwhile, appear to be revving their engines for another fight.
Meera Joshi, chairwoman of the TLC, told Crain's its 180,000 licensed drivers would continue to be a target for union organizing. But she warned that the labor groups' disunity and self-interest could hobble efforts to curb the tech giants. "Because there is this hostility of 'who's going to own this space?,' it could end up being counterproductive," she said. "There's a question of, will any regulation come out at all? Why don't you focus on that, instead of fighting each other?"
© 2018 Crain Communications Inc.  All rights reserved.


7 years 2 months ago

All of my clients want to know how quickly they can recover their credit score and so here is the answer. If you are proactive you can have a six eighty or six 90 credit score. Two years after we file the bankruptcy petition the way that you do that is you obtain a credit card immediately after we file. You start using the card responsibly and you only charge 50 percent of the limit on the card and you pay that off every single month. If you do that for two years you're going to have a 680 credit score in two years.
The post Am I Eligible to File Bankruptcy? appeared first on Tucson Bankruptcy Attorney.


7 years 2 months ago

On June 4, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling, No. 16-1215, which dealt with the dischargeability of debt in bankruptcy proceedings. The Court held that a statement about a single asset can be a “statement respecting the debtor’s financial condition” under section 523(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. Read More ›
Tags: Chapter 7, U.S. Supreme Court


7 years 3 months ago

rebuild credit after bankruptcyTo rebuild credit after bankruptcy, you need to have a plan. That plan has to be better than the one that landed you into bankruptcy in the first place. Sure, it’s a huge relief to have all that debt off your shoulders, but the bankruptcy will be on your record for the next 10 years for those who filed for Chapter 7.
On the other hand, the older the bankruptcy is, the lower the impact it will have on credit offers. In other words, potential creditors will consider the most recent activity the most important information. To rebuild credit after bankruptcy, you must regain the trust of creditors.
If your debt has spiraled out of control, a fresh start may be exactly what you need. Call the bankruptcy attorneys at Allmand Law Firm, PLLC at (214) 740-3682 and we can start discussing your situation.
You Can Begin Restoring Your Credit Right Away
Contrary to popular belief, your credit isn’t “ruined” because you filed for bankruptcy. On the other hand, it isn’t in a very good place either. It has to be rebuilt from scratch.
Before we get into that, however, let’s take a look at why you might be an attractive prospect to potential lenders.
Firstly, if you’ve filed for Chapter 7, it will be another 8 years before you’re allowed to file again. Secondly, a lender likes to see that you can pay for your basic needs, handle the potential debt you will be incurring, and still have money left over. After your Chapter 7 was granted, you had all or most of your debt cleared. So basically, you’re not as much of a risk to a creditor as you probably think.
It’s not as hard as you probably think to rebuild credit after bankruptcy.
Developing a Sound Credit Strategy
Rebuilding credit isn’t hard, but it isn’t like building credit either. You’re not a risk to creditors because they don’t know anything about you. You’re a risk to creditors because you didn’t pay back the money you owed. Now, you just need a workable strategy on which to operate.
The first thing you want to do is check out your credit score. If there are claims against you that you think are false, then you can dispute those. More likely than not, those claims will still be valid. Just because Chapter 7 wipes out your debt doesn’t mean that it will cleanse your credit report as well. It’s just the opposite.
Secured Loans and Secured Credit Cards
Now starts the process of rebuilding your credit. You will find to find a bank or a creditor that is willing to deal with you despite the fact that you’re coming out of bankruptcy. To rebuild credit after bankruptcy you must establish a history of repaying loans.
One way to do this is by applying for a secured loan.
What is a secured loan? There are two different kinds. The first type allows you to borrow money against money you already have deposited. Usually, this type of loan is offered by banks or credit unions. That money will be inaccessible until you’ve paid off the loan.
The second type involves the release of a loan into a savings account that you cannot access until you’ve made a set amount of payments.
In other words, you’re “borrowing” money that you already have. In exchange, the bank agrees to send this information to credit bureaus. This new information will appear on your credit report.
Secured cards work much the same way where you borrow against money you have on deposit.
Co-Signed Credit Card or Loan
If you know someone who is willing to incur the risk, then having them cosign on a card or a loan is a viable way to rebuild credit after bankruptcy. Understand, however, this is a huge favor to ask. They are incurring the risk if you default.
Rebuild Credit After Bankruptcy: Final Steps
Eventually, an offer of credit will be extended to you. A credit card, for instance, with a $500 limit. Use this card, but pay it back on a monthly basis! Make sure your balance does not go over 30% of your limit and you will be well on your way to rebuilding your credit after bankruptcy.
Contact a Bankruptcy Attorney Today
To learn more about how you can rebuild credit after bankruptcy, contact Allmand Law Firm, PLLC at (214) 740-3682 today.
The post How to Rebuild Credit After Bankruptcy appeared first on Allmand Law.



Pages