Blogs

5 hours 58 min ago

There is an alarming decrease in the number of attorneys representing debtors these days.  No new attorneys are entering the field. Attorneys in the prime of their career are exiting the field.  The attorneys remaining are quite older and they are scaling back their practice.  In the next 5 years several senior attorneys will fully retire.What is more, the attorneys still actively practicing are not hiring. No one is hiring junior associates. No one is building.This trend is not limited to consumer bankruptcy cases. Chapter 11 and 12 attorneys have also left the field. At a time when business and farm bankruptcies are rising, there is a lack of attorneys willing to take on these cases.The trend in consumer cases is for attorneys to work from home without supporting staff. Where are all the bankruptcy attorneys? Why are attorneys leaving the field in the prime of their career? Why is no one hiring? Something is wrong, but what is it?Three technology factors account for some of the decline in hiring:

  • Remote 341 Hearings: Established bankruptcy firms hired associates to represent clients before the bankruptcy trustee, but those hearings transitioned to telephonic and later Zoom video hearings during Covid. It is no longer necessary to hire associate to cover hearings spread out in Omaha, Lincoln, Grand Island, North Platte and Scottsbluff, Nebraska.  In-person trustee meetings are a thing of the past.
  • Digital Signatures: New court rules allowing clients to sign documents with digital signatures.  Clients no longer meet personally with an attorney to sign documents.
  • Digital Documents:  Instead of dropping off a pile of bills, paystubs, bank statement, tax returns and other documents required to prepare a bankruptcy petition, most clients upload documents digitally.  Although some clients still hand over paper documents, most do not.  There is no need to meet with clients to receive paper documents.

These changes account for some of the reduction in bankruptcy attorneys and for the trend towards working from home without staff. But this does not explain why attorneys are exiting the field in the prime of their career. Shouldn’t the ability to represent clients remotely throughout the entire state without the need to travel to distant court hearings actually encourage entrepreneurial attorneys to expand their practice by hiring new associates? Shouldn’t cost reductions in gathering and signing documents cause firms to expand?  Something is wrong here.Lack of Compensation:The number one cause of a decline in the debtor’s bar is the lack of compensation.  Firms are not hiring new attorneys because they are not confident they can afford the salaries. Chapter 13 attorneys have seen a decrease of their income drop by nearly 20% over the past five years due to inflation.  The court’s response?  Apparently a 6% fee increase is arriving soon and Nebraska fees are in line with other courts in the 8th Circuit, but nevertheless a permanent pay cut has been levied. Chapter 13 attorneys are paid flat fee set by the court (currently $4,700) and attorneys lack the ability to charge hourly.  Attorneys are leaving the field to practice in other areas of law where they can get paid for their time.Chapter 7 attorneys charge a flat fee that is reviewed by the US Trustee’s office. Attorneys cannot collect fees after a case is filed (since their debt is discharged along with all other debts), and debtors cannot finance their case with personal loans.No Fee Splitting: Debtor attorneys may not share compensation or split fees with other attorneys without court approval, although creditor attorneys can and do split fees routinely. It is difficult to “team up” with other attorneys for this reason.Increase in Bureaucratic Complexity:  Our bankruptcy process becomes more complicated by the day. New rules and forms pop up every year. I recently handled a probate case and I was amazed that the procedures and forms were the same as 30 years ago. Everything was exactly the same.  Not so with bankruptcy practice.Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005:  Congress made radical changes to the bankruptcy law in 2005 with the specific purpose of making the process expensive and difficult. They succeeded.  At first we did not notice the impact since the Great Recession of 2008 swelled the bankruptcy filings, but 20 years later the result is clear.  The incredible burden of gathering so much information has made the process miserable and tedious. Where do we go from here?Without reform this trend will continue. Attorneys will continue to leave the field and debtors will struggle to find competent representation. Farm clients are being turned away routinely. Business clients have few attorneys to pick from. Consumer attorneys are declining to represent difficult clients knowing they can never recoup the time expended in handling their cases.Suggestions:

  • Review compensation rules to ensure attorneys receive fair compensation in comparison to other fields of law. Index fees to inflation.
  • Cut down on burdensome procedural changes.
  • Engage debtor attorneys in regular and informal settings to get real feedback.
  • Sponsor “nuts and bolts” seminars to teach young attorneys how to practice.
  • Fix the chapter 13 confirmation process. The stipulated confirmation order process is a failure. The Chapter 13 trustee attorneys are unwilling to resolve simple objections with a stipulation. 
  • Promote uniformity in the Chapter 7 process.  Every trustee uses a different system to gather documents and has different practice rules. 
  • Encourage attorneys to take on chapter 11 and 12 cases. Attorneys must feel confident they will be paid for taking on these complex matters. More educational and procedural information is needed. Sample plans, forms, and examples are needed to instruct new attorneys.
  • Community Building.  Nobody likes working alone. Attorneys need a place to routinely visit with other local attorneys to improve their skills. Informal workshops that give CLE credit would be attractive.

Nebraskans need competent professionals to help them through hard times.


1 day 21 hours ago

 Currently Not Collectible (CNC) Status and Defaulted SBA Loans“Currently Not Collectible” (CNC) status can, in limited cases, be used to temporarily pause collection activity on a defaulted SBA loan. CNC is not an SBA program and is not available immediately after default. It may only be requested once the loan has been charged off, assigned to the SBA, and referred to the U.S. Treasury or IRS for collection. At that stage, collection efforts may include the Treasury Offset Program, private collection agencies, or IRS cross-servicing. If the IRS is the active collector, a borrower may request CNC status by demonstrating financial hardship. To qualify, the borrower must show that there is no disposable income after basic living expenses. If approved, CNC may temporarily stop wage garnishments, levies, and aggressive IRS collection actions. However, CNC does not eliminate the SBA debt or stop interest from accruing. Tax refunds may still be intercepted, and the account can be reactivated if the borrower’s financial condition improves. Even with CNC status, the SBA retains the right to enforce guarantees and resume collection efforts in the future.Borrowers or advisors with questions about defaulted SBA loans and borrower alternatives should contact Jim Shenwick, Esq
Jim Shenwick, Esq  917 363 3391  [email protected]Please click the link to schedule a telephone call with me. https://calendly.com/james-shenwick/15minWe help individuals & businesses with too much debt!


1 week 21 hours ago

 
 

At Shenwick and Associates, we regularly represent
individuals and businesses facing financial distress, including borrowers who
have defaulted on Small Business Administration (SBA) loans. Over the past
several months, we have observed a marked increase in aggressive collection
activity
by the SBA and the U.S. Department of the Treasury against
borrowers and guarantors of defaulted SBA loans.

 

Heightened Enforcement Activity in Late 2025 and 2026

Beginning in the last quarter of 2025 and continuing into
2026
, collection efforts by the SBA and the Treasury have intensified.
These efforts are not limited to letters or informal demands. Instead, we are
seeing the government use a broad range of statutory collection tools,
including:

  • Retention
    of private collection agencies
    to pursue defaulted SBA loans;
  • Administrative
    wage garnishment
    of up to 15% of a debtor’s wages, without the
    need for a court judgment;
  • Seizure
    of federal tax refunds
    through the Treasury Offset Program; and
  • Offset
    of Social Security benefits
    , with up to 15% of monthly payments
    taken from individuals who are personally liable for, or who guaranteed,
    SBA loans.
  •  

These collection actions are being taken against both
primary obligors and personal guarantors of SBA loans. If you signed a
personal guarantee, your personal income and federal benefits may be at risk.

 

The “They Won’t Collect” Myth

We recently met with a new client who told us that their
accountant had advised them: “Don’t worry about a defaulted SBA loan—the SBA
isn’t really collecting on those loans.” Unfortunately, that advice is simply
wrong
!

 

Based on our recent experience and the increasing number of
calls we are receiving, it is clear that the SBA and Treasury authorities are
actively pursuing collection
of defaulted SBA loans. Assuming that the
government will not act is a mistaken and risky strategy that can result
in wage garnishments, lost tax refunds, and reduced Social Security income.

Take Action Early

If you have defaulted on an SBA loan, or if you personally
guaranteed
an SBA loan that is now in default, it is critical to take
proactive steps. Options may exist to address the debt, such as a mitigate
collection efforts, or restructure or resolve the obligation, or a bankruptcy
filing and or a payment plan with Treasry—but those options are often
time-sensitive.

 

Consulting with an experienced bankruptcy and workout
professional
can make a meaningful difference in protecting your income,
your retirement income and your financial future.

 

If you are facing collection activity related to a defaulted
SBA loan, we encourage you to seek qualified legal advice sooner rather than
later. For those clients or their advisors who have questions with respect to defaulted
SBA loans, please contact Jim Shenwick, Esq.

 

Jim Shenwick, Esq 

917 363 3391 

[email protected]

Please click the link to schedule a telephone call with me.

 https://calendly.com/james-shenwick/15min

 

We help individuals & businesses with too much debt!


3 weeks 6 days ago

Are you embarrassed that you can’t get by at 48.07 per hour?
Forty-eight dollars per hour, actually $48.07, is a hundred thousand dollars a year. That sounds like a lot of money, but people who are making that much are contacting me in record numbers. Maybe you should, too.
The truth is $100,000 annually doesn’t go very far around here. (Last week, one really rich guy in the news said he considers $140,000 for a family of four as the “poverty line.”)
By contrast, Patrick Mahomes, one of the highest paid athletes ever, makes about $48 million a year. Is he worth that?  While he’s having a bad season, he is still better at football than you or me or almost anybody.
Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia CommonsElon Musk makes $48 million an hour.
If you are making $100,000 a year, you aren’t Patrick Mahomes. And you certainly aren’t Elon Musk. You shouldn’t be too embarrassed to contact a bankruptcy lawyer.
Elon Musk Makes $48 million an hour
Recently, Elon Musk had his hand-picked board of directors at Tesla vote him a trillion dollars over ten years.  That’s $48 million an hour! Musk makes as much every hour as Mahomes does in an entire season.
That means if you are making $48 an hour, a hundred thousand a year, Elon Musk thinks he’s a million times better than you.
Are you struggling to make ends meet?
So if you are struggling to make ends meet, even if you make a hundred thousand dollars, don’t be embarrassed to call a bankruptcy lawyer. I talk to a dozen people a month who are making more than $100,000. Let’s talk about whether bankruptcy can fix your cash flow problems.
I understand that it costs a lot to live around here, and I know you are not Elon Musk.
Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
Two or three times a month, I suggest Chapter 13 for high income families.  As a rule of thumb, Chapter 13 can reduce your monthly payments by about one-third.  (Sometimes more. Now and then, a lot more.) And, unlike the so called debt settlement or debt consolidation outfits, your creditors can’t bypass the Chapter 13 plan and sue you in state court.
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Often even high income people ar eligible for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and can discharge their debts. Even high income families can be eligible.  
Let’s talk
As long as you are not as rich as Patrick Mahomes or Elon Musk, the bankruptcy law can probably help you. Donald Trump is embarrased to talk about his business bankruptcies, but he wasn’t too embarrased to file (business) bankruptcy. He said it’s “just business” to use “the chapters” to “pare debt.”  He said, “I’ve used it three, maybe four times, and came out great.”
If Donald Trump wasn’t too embarrassed to use the “laws of this counrty,” Find out if you can clear your debt, too.
 
 
 
The post Too embarassed to talk to a bankruptcy lawyer? appeared first on Robert Weed Virginia Bankruptcy Attorney.


1 month 2 weeks ago

 
Why is it Too Late for Asset Protection Planning after a Claim or Litigation Arises?Jay Adkisson has written a very informative article about why it is difficult to do Asset Protection Planning after a claim or lawsuit arises. The article was published in Forbes. At Shenwick & Associates we get many telephone calls and emails from clients about Asset Protection Planning and we summarize that article below.   Clients
often ask whether they can protect their assets after a lawsuit threat appears
on the horizon. Mr.  Adkisson explains in his article, that once a
claim exists, meaningful asset protection planning is unavailable. Under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (and its predecessor,
the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act), a “claim” arises the moment the
underlying event giving rise to liability occurs—not when a demand letter
arrives, not when a complaint is filed, and not when a judgment is entered. Any transfers made
after that point are vulnerable to attack as voidable transactions.

Many
debtors mistakenly believe they are safe if payments are current or no lawsuit
has been threatened, but the law provides no such protection. Mr. Adkisson states that post-claim
transfers often trigger serious consequences far beyond simply unwinding the
transaction. -Creditors can sue the transferee—often a spouse, child, or
friend—and obtain a judgment for the value of the transferred asset. -Courts may
award attorney’s fees, civil conspiracy damages, or even punitive or trebled
damages if the transfer was intended to evade creditors. In bankruptcy, these
transfers can result in denial of discharge under § 727, converting what might
have been a dischargeable debt into a permanent financial burden.

 Asset
protection planning must occur before any claim exists. However, if a claim exists or litigation has been commenced clients are still allowed to utilize Federal & State Exemption statutes.Clients or their advisors with questions about Asset Protection Planning should contact Jim Shenwick, Esq. 917 363 3391  [email protected]Jim Shenwick, Esq  917 363 3391  [email protected] Please click the link to schedule a telephone call with me. https://calendly.com/james-shenwick/15minWe help individuals & businesses with too much debt!


Chapter 7 Business Bankruptcy Filings in SDNY and EDNY

2 hours 58 min ago


Chapter 7 Business Bankruptcy Filings in SDNY and EDNY

5 hours 58 min ago


Chapter 7 Business Bankruptcy Filings in SDNY and EDNY

8 hours 58 min ago


Chapter 7 Business Bankruptcy Filings in SDNY and EDNY

14 hours 59 min ago


Chapter 7 Business Bankruptcy Filings in SDNY and EDNY

14 hours 59 min ago


Pages